Dianetics for Dummies

Dianetics for Dummies

Blog Article

Dianetics Things To Know Before You Get This

I couldn't ever before not intend to obtain anything that enters your mind for you- if it was otherwise, I would not be sitting here with you, doing this. I not just can never ever have a trouble, or not want to listen to something that enters your mind for you, yet I'm entirely anxious to understand every idea, every thought, every picture or sensation that arises or materializes for you- don't ever before believe or else, and if somehow you do, please just let me recognize! Often, you may have an idea, and photo, concept or incident pop up that does not appear to answer the inquiry, or connect to it, but however, always do inform me concerning it, and as we continue, the relevance will certainly emerge for you.


This is intrinsic in the basis of processing, and the subject of this conversation: the basic roles of the therapist and the customer: The basic role of the counselor is, contrary to "common training", not to control, which means to impose and/or inhibit, but to instead function from the basis of EMPOWERING THE CUSTOMER.


In subjective processing, regardless of what was said in one's training materials, the processor is not there "to manage" the customer. On the contrary, the processor exists to approve the client the freedom and undistracted emphasis to procedure and express what manifests, and what materializes is what arises when the client deals with the material that associates with their very own objectives for the handling, and for their life.

The Main Principles Of Dianetics

John Mcmasters expressed this fundamental reality wonderfully well in one of his talks on Power handling, wherein he describes how he was asked what this "special flair" was that he had for providing such wonderful sessions; he needed to consider that for a minute, and spotted that it was what he had not been doing, along with what he was doing: he had not been examining, evaluating, computer, or in reality, creating any ideas, not to mention spoken expressions, after providing the command and while awaiting the PC to finish their response to their satisfaction; he was, simply and just, being present with the computer, and completely interested.




The role of the therapist, demonstrated; that was his "unique knack". I have had my own experience which showed me this well, really beforehand in the video game. In 1982, having recently finished my training and teaching fellowship on New Period Dianetics, I was running this on a PC, and there was a point in the session where (being a bit wet behind the ears not yet having numerous hours under my belt as a professional auditor) the PC appeared to be "taking too lengthy" to share anything vocally after I provided him a command.


This secret turned out to be the most important payment that John ever before made to the subject of treatment or bookkeeping (Dianetics). In my humble point of view, it is the biggest payment that anyone has ever before made to these subjectsthe application is entirely non-judgemental, non-evaluative, and without any kind of recommendation, recommendations or opinion.no preconditioned schedule for individuals, or 'degrees' that they must do


In Scientology we prided ourselves on not examining for individuals. All that actually implied was that the auditor did not VERBALLY review for the PC in session.

The 8-Minute Rule for Dianetics

The Scientology Bridge is extremely evaluative and judgmentalAt initially, we liquid chalked up the distinction in outcomes to John's improvisational skills and experience. However, upon additional investigation, particular factors concerned lightIt was not an issue of what he WAS doing that the various other practitioners weren't, but instead what he WASrefraining from doing that they were.


Anyone that had ever seen John audit can not help however observe a special quality in his bookkeeping."The client's fundamental duty is to be there with the function of relocating the direction of their spiritual objectives, and to easily and fully share and experience whatever materializes for them in responding to the questions and executing the instructions in the handling.


This is something to procedure as needed. But additionally, individuals often have previous experience and/or see post indoctrination in auditing/processing which, in some means, and to some levels, in fact misinforms them into mindsets, ideas and behavior patterns that protect against the full realization of these duties, therefore they will often tend to inhibit the expressing of what comes to mind, as in the examples offered over. * The initial, and maybe leading examples of mis-indoctrination resulting in much less than entirely smooth and efficient sessions, can be found in certain facets of the training routines, or "TR's":"TR's" are often an individual's first, or at the very least early, experience in Scientology, and while I will certainly take place to clarify what I see Visit Your URL as the flaws in concept and technique, however, tend to be greatly restorative, done as they are offered (Hubbard insists that "TR's are not processing, they are training", yet factually, they are both handling AND training)


Alan Walter made similar monitorings, and enhanced these with his "Visibility Processes". There is no "failing", and no rejection of the fact of this being processing. The focus, as it ought to be, gets on experiencing the other person's presence. All the symptoms which Bonuses get a "fail" in doing "TR-0" are just the being's efforts to resist the other individual's visibility, and instead of being harassed and badgered with "Flunk", which imposes "failing!" on the being, one just requires to be encouraged to "stick their feet in the water a little deeper", to increasingly rehabilitate their ability and readiness to totally share and experience "being right here", or "visibility", with others.

Dianetics - Truths

I wait till the client checks out me as if to say "I'm done answering, over to you, what's following?" As long as the client is looking somewhere else than back at the counselor, they are still processing the question or command. Keep in mind "a silent auditor invites itsa"; the client is still refining, up until their attention plainly returns to the counselor.

Report this page